Redburn Atlantic’s decision to downgrade Adobe to Sell and slash its price target from $420 to $280 reveals more about the analyst’s speculative leanings than Adobe’s actual strategic positioning. Omar Sheikh’s thesis rests on a fragile foundation of exaggerated fears about generative AI “disruption” while discounting the real-world advantages Adobe still possesses—advantages that competitors like Midjourney, Runway, and even OpenAI’s Sora simply cannot replicate at scale or depth.
First, the claim that Adobe’s moat is “being eroded” by AI tools dominating the “ideation phase” is a superficial read of how the creative industry actually operates. The ideation phase is just that—an idea. It is not execution. It is not post-production. It is not compliance, file versioning, collaborative editing, or integrated publishing workflows—areas where Adobe remains not just relevant but dominant. Professionals and enterprises don’t simply generate an image with Midjourney and upload it to a billboard. They still need Photoshop, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, and After Effects to meet the precision demands of the market. Adobe’s Creative Cloud isn’t just a toolbox—it’s an integrated ecosystem with decades of inertia, plugins, workflows, and enterprise penetration that no “cool AI startup” can currently replicate.
Sheikh’s assertion that Adobe’s pricing power is doomed is also premature. Adobe has proven over a decade that it can both raise prices and increase subscribers. Firefly, despite its current output limitations, is deeply integrated into Adobe’s apps—not a standalone gimmick. This native integration gives Adobe an edge that model-first startups don’t have. The analyst criticizes Firefly’s generative capabilities without acknowledging Adobe’s deliberate, ethical AI approach—training its models on licensed content and user-generated data, which avoids the legal exposure that looms over companies scraping public content indiscriminately. Adobe’s content authenticity initiative and watermarking strategy show long-term thinking about AI in the creative economy—something these so-called “superior tools” often lack entirely.
Redburn’s modeling of FCF growth—slowing from 8% in 2026 to 3% by 2030—assumes a straight-line decline, which is both lazy and misleading. It underplays Adobe’s ability to pivot, acquire, and expand into new markets. The report itself paradoxically floats strategic options like acquiring a cutting-edge model or spinning off a subsidiary, yet dismisses them outright as “unlikely.” This contradiction undermines their own argument. If these paths are plausible enough to list, then they’re plausible enough to model. Adobe’s leadership has demonstrated agility before—it moved to cloud subscriptions ahead of nearly every peer in enterprise software. There’s little reason to believe it won’t navigate this wave of AI with similar foresight.
Finally, calling for a multiple contraction to 12x EV/FCF feels more like a shock-value bet than grounded valuation logic. Adobe, with an 89% gross margin and a fortress balance sheet, is not Blockbuster watching Netflix approach—it’s a platform reinventing itself with proprietary assets, sticky user bases, and a seat at the enterprise table. Betting against a company with this kind of financial discipline and brand equity in creative software—especially at a time when creative content is exploding globally—is, frankly, reckless.
Redburn’s downgrade plays to a growing anti-incumbent narrative in tech investing that often ignores operational realities. Adobe has challenges ahead, yes—but to paint them as a company in freefall is not just inaccurate. It’s irresponsible.